Elden Ring Player Files Lawsuit in Small Claims CourtContent Hidden by ‘Skill Issue’
FromSoftware games are renowned for their challenging but fair difficulty. The recently released Elden Ring DLC, Shadow of the Erdtree, further elevates this reputation, as even seasoned veterans found the additional content "too difficult".
The plaintiff admitted to having no concrete evidence to support their claims, relying instead on what they describe as "constant hints" dropped by the game developers. They referenced Sekiro’s art book, which hinted at Genichiro’s potential as a "ninja in the other side of the story," and a statement made by FromSoftware President Hidetaka Miyazaki about humanity’s role as a "shackle" waiting to be broken in Bloodborne.
Essentially, they summed up their case as "you paid for content that you can’t access without even knowing about it."
It’s common for games to include remnants of cut content within their code and files. This often happens due to time constraints or development limitations. It’s a common practice across the gaming industry, and it doesn’t necessarily indicate intentionally hidden content.
Can the Lawsuit Hold Up in Court?
According to the government website of Massachusetts, where the plaintiff filed their case, anyone who is 18 or older can sue in small claims court. It’s an informal court, so there is no need for an attorney. The validity of the case, however, will be determined by the judge before or on the court date.
The plaintiff could bring their claim under "Consumer Protection Law", which states that "’unfair or deceptive practices’ are illegal", by saying that the developers "fails to tell you relevant information regarding the product or service or misleads you in any way." However, proving such claims will be a formidable challenge. The plaintiff must provide substantial evidence to support their allegations of the game having a "hidden dimension" in it. They must also defend how this deception harmed consumers. Without concrete proof, the case is likely to be dismissed due to being highly speculative and lacking merit.
It’s important to note that even if the plaintiff manages to overcome these hurdles and win the case, the potential damages awarded in Small Claims Court are limited.
Despite this, however, the plaintiff remained adamant about their case. "I don’t care if the case is dismissed, just so long as I get Namco Bandai on public record saying the dimension exists. That’s all I care about," the plaintiff said in the 4Chan thread.